COMPARE / EVIDENCE MATRIX

Compare plans, cost, and fit.

Ashby vs Greenhouse · 1-person scenario

Editorial snapshot. Confirm plan terms with official sources.

Decision criteria8 signals
01Recruiting
02Recruiting
Purchase scenario1 person
$400/mo$4,800/yr
LowestPer account
QuoteCheckout
No baselineCustom quote
Best forTeams consolidating sourcing, ATS, scheduling, analytics, and offersOrganizations standardizing repeatable, auditable hiring across teams and regions
Starting priceFoundations $400/month up to 100 employees; 10% annual discount availableCustom quote for Core, Plus, or Pro
Ease of useModerateModerate
CollaborationExcellentExcellent
AI featuresCandidate search, outreach personalization, application review, interview summaries, and recruiting assistantsTalent matching, report filters, fraud detection, and structured hiring assistance by plan
PlatformsWebWeb, iOS, Android
Export formatsReports, CSV, APIs, webhooks, job feeds, and offer documentsReports, CSV, BI connector, APIs, job feeds, and offer documents
Offline accessNoNo

ATLAS VERDICT / 01

Start with Ashby. Choose Greenhouse when the comparison evidence in its column better matches your constraints.

Tool Atlas compares workflow fit, published pricing snapshots, product capability, and plan trade-offs. Pricing sources and verification dates are available here, on every tool profile, and in Stack Compare.